DQ look at once

 


1. Tata Steel ERP System & Financial Accounting

Answer:
The adoption of an ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system enhances financial accounting by integrating financial data across departments and geographies. For Tata Steel, this improves the accuracy, timeliness, and consistency of financial reports. Key functions improved include ledger maintenance, real-time financial consolidation, cost control, and compliance tracking. ERP aids decision-making by providing reliable data, enabling budgeting, forecasting, and variance analysis, which are critical for strategic planning.


2. Financial Accounting for Stakeholders

Answer:
External stakeholders (e.g., investors, creditors, regulators) benefit more directly from standardized financial statements because they rely on uniform and comparable data for evaluating financial health and compliance. Internal stakeholders also benefit, but they often need more detailed, customized, and real-time data than what financial accounting provides. Hence, while both groups benefit, external users depend more critically on standardized formats.


3. ERP & Financial Accounting Objectives

Answer:
ERP systems align with financial accounting objectives by promoting reliability, transparency, and compliance. For Tata Steel, the ERP implementation ensures that financial data is recorded and reported consistently across locations. Internally, this supports cost control and strategic analysis, and externally, it ensures compliance with IFRS/GAAP standards and regulatory bodies. It minimizes errors, reduces fraud risk, and improves audit readiness.


4. Going Concern & Accrual Concepts

Answer:
The Going Concern concept assumes the business will continue operations indefinitely, while the Accrual Concept ensures revenues and expenses are recorded when incurred, not when cash changes hands. Together, they allow financial statements to reflect long-term value and obligations. If going concern is violated (e.g., liquidation), assets would be reported at net realizable value, and long-term plans like depreciation schedules become invalid—leading to major distortions in the financials.


5. Startup Delaying GAAP Adoption

Answer:
Risks:

  • Loss of stakeholder trust due to non-comparability and lack of transparency
  • Difficulty in due diligence during fundraising or M&A
  • Costly retroactive compliance

Benefits:

  • Reduced initial compliance burden
  • Greater flexibility in early-stage decision-making

However, long-term disadvantages outweigh short-term benefits. Without GAAP, reports lack credibility, potentially affecting investor confidence and regulatory approval later.


6. Business Entity Concept & Sole Proprietorship

Answer:
The Business Entity Concept dictates that business and personal transactions must be separated. In this scenario, failing to do so can lead to:

  • Inaccurate financial reporting
  • Distorted tax calculations
  • Compromised legal liability clarity

To resolve, the entrepreneur must maintain separate bank accounts, keep distinct records, and draw a fixed capital or salary from the business. Not applying this concept risks tax penalties and decision-making based on misleading data.


7. Dual Aspect Concept: Share Issuance

Answer:
Issuing shares for cash affects the accounting equation as follows:

  • Assets increase (Cash ↑)
  • Equity increases (Share Capital ↑)
    There is no effect on liabilities. This maintains the equation:
    Assets = Liabilities + Equity

For example, issuing ₹1,00,000 worth of shares for cash will increase assets and equity by ₹1,00,000 each.


8. Limitations: Non-Quantifiable Factors

Answer:
Financial accounting fails to represent intangible but impactful factors such as brand value, employee satisfaction, or corporate culture. These are often crucial to valuation and profitability (e.g., Apple’s brand value). As these are not recorded unless acquired, the book value may significantly understate a firm's worth, leading to misleading valuations especially during M&A or investment analysis.


9. Inconsistency in Depreciation Method

Answer:
Switching from Straight-Line to Written Down Value (WDV) without disclosure violates the Consistency Convention, leading to:

  • Distorted comparisons over time
  • Misleading profit trends and asset valuation
  • Potential audit qualifications

To restore credibility, the company must:

  • Disclose the change and justify the rationale
  • Restate prior period financials (if required)
  • Ensure consistency moving forward

10. Conservatism Convention: Underreporting?

Answer:
Conservatism promotes prudence by recognizing anticipated losses but not unrealized gains. This may understate performance but protects users from over-optimism. For instance, inventory is recorded at the lower of cost or market value. While this may distort short-term profitability, it prevents inflated expectations and overvaluation. The principle favors caution over optimism, enhancing stakeholder trust, though at the cost of not fully reflecting economic reality.


Here are model answers for Unit 2: Accounting Process & Rules and Unit 3: Preparation of Financial Statements, based on the provided image content:


Unit 2: Accounting Process & Rules

1. Case: E-commerce company returns not recorded properly

Answer:
Inconsistent recording leads to:

  • Trial balance discrepancies
  • Revenue overstatement
  • Inventory mismatches
  • Poor customer liability tracking

Improvements:

  • Implement a centralized return recording system
  • Use integrated ERP with automated journal entries
  • Enforce departmental coordination protocols

2. Scenario: MiraTech skips journal maintenance

Answer:
Omitting the journal reduces:

  • Audit traceability
  • Error tracing capacity
  • Chronological documentation

Recommendation: Maintain a digital journal log even in automated systems to uphold transparency and compliance. Traditional practices (like journal logs) should be digitally adapted, not discarded.


3. Accounting cycle checklist for retail business

Answer:
Checklist:

  1. Record sales (digital/POS) & credit invoices
  2. Post to journal with automation rules
  3. Daily ledger update
  4. Periodic trial balance prep
  5. Reconciliation checks
  6. Adjusting entries
  7. Final accounts
  8. Review controls:
    • Transaction validation
    • Segregation of duties
    • Auto-alerts on discrepancies

4. Impact of misclassification

Answer:
Example: Classifying loan repayment as salary expense

  • Trial Balance: Unbalanced if wrongly posted
  • P&L: Overstated expenses
  • Balance Sheet: Loan balance remains unpaid

Result: Misinterpretation of debt and profitability.


5. Intern training – flowchart

Answer:
Flowchart Steps:

  1. Transaction occurs (sale/purchase)
  2. Journal Entry
  3. Posting to Ledger
  4. Trial Balance generation
  5. Adjustments (depreciation, provisions)
  6. Final Accounts prep

Key controls:

  • Entry validation
  • Ledger review
  • Auto-reconciliation
  • Approval workflows

6. Automation solution proposal

Answer:
Use software like Tally, Zoho Books, QuickBooks:

  • Capture transaction via invoice scanning, bank sync
  • Auto-journal entry
  • Real-time ledger updates
  • Trial Balance auto-generated
  • Built-in adjustments and tax modules
  • Final reports generation (P&L, BS)

7. ERP + manual backups

Answer:
Manual records can be efficient under certain risks:

  • Power outages
  • ERP glitches
  • Legal/tax inspections requiring physical trail

Keep as secondary control, not primary source.


9. Decision-making framework: Classifying accounts

Answer:

  • Real Account – Assets (e.g., Furniture A/c)
  • Personal Account – Individuals/firms (e.g., Ram’s A/c)
  • Nominal Account – Expenses/incomes (e.g., Rent Paid)

Example 1: Capital introduced → Personal (Capital A/c)
Example 2: Equipment purchase → Real (Asset A/c)
Example 3: Salary paid → Nominal (Salary A/c)


10. Double-entry and accounting equation

Answer:
Each transaction has dual impact ensuring:
Assets = Liabilities + Equity

Transaction flow:

  • Capital ₹5L introduced → Cash ↑ (Asset), Capital ↑ (Equity)
  • Buy furniture ₹1L → Asset ↔ Asset
  • Revenue ₹2L → Cash ↑, Income ↑ (equity via P&L)

Maintains balance and traceability.


Unit 3: Preparation of Financial Statements

1. Trial Balance mismatch causes

Answer:

  • Omitted entries
  • Unequal debit/credit posting
  • Misclassification
  • Calculation errors

Steps:

  1. Recheck ledger balances
  2. Verify journal entries
  3. Trial Balance sheet cross-checking
  4. Use suspense account if needed temporarily

2. Intern mentorship: Final account steps

Answer:

  1. Trial Balance review
  2. Add adjustments:
    • Prepaid Rent
    • Accrued Salary
    • Depreciation
    • Outstanding Expenses
    • Income Received in Advance
  3. Prepare:
    • Trading A/c
    • P&L A/c
    • Balance Sheet

Include adjusted closing stock in Trading A/c.


3. Step-by-step with hypothetical data

Example:

  • Trial Balance:
    • Sales: ₹5,00,000
    • Purchases: ₹3,00,000
    • Salaries: ₹50,000
    • Depreciation: ₹10,000
    • Prepaid Rent: ₹5,000

Adjustments:

  • Adjust purchases with closing stock
  • Prepaid rent → less in P&L, more in BS
  • Depreciation → expense + reduced asset

Prepare final accounts with adjusted figures.


4. Profit & Loss vs Balance Sheet

Answer:

  • P&L: Operating performance (profit/loss)
  • BS: Financial position (assets/liabilities)
    Combined, they guide:
  • Working capital analysis
  • Retention policy (reserves, dividends)

5. Limitations of single-year FS

Answer:

  • Ignores trends
  • No benchmark
  • Misleads stakeholders

Improvement:

  • Use horizontal & vertical analysis
  • Ratio analysis over 3–5 years
  • Trend graphs

6. Prepaid insurance error

Answer:

  • Mistake: ₹50,000 expense overstated in P&L
  • BS asset (prepaid) understated
    Fix: Adjust ₹50,000 to Prepaid Insurance (asset)
    Controls: Period-end review, adjustment tracking, trial balance scrutiny

7. Vertical vs Horizontal Balance Sheet

Answer:

  • Vertical: Modern format, step-by-step clarity
  • Easier to read, suits external users & investors
  • Clear separation of current vs non-current

Conclusion: Vertical preferred for analysis.


8. Ignoring non-cash adjustments

Answer:
Leads to:

  • Overstated profits (no depreciation)
  • Missing obligations (no outstanding expenses)

Example:
Net profit shows ₹2L, but if depreciation ₹30k ignored, profit is inflated. Accrual-based adjustments show true performance.


9. Profit ↑ but poor BS health

Answer:
Red flags:

  • High liabilities
  • Low liquidity
  • Delayed receivables

Combined reading needed to see:

  • Earnings quality
  • Financial risks
  • Sustainability of operations


Unit 4: Accounting for Assets (Cash, Inventory, Receivables, Fixed Assets)

Q1. Case: XYZ Ltd. - rising receivables and declining cash flow

  • Financial Implication: Increasing receivables reduce cash inflows, potentially leading to liquidity issues.
  • Indicators to assess collectability risk:
    • Debtor turnover ratio
    • Aging schedule of receivables
    • Percentage of overdue receivables
    • Bad debts to total receivables ratio

Q2. Effectiveness of aging report

  • Helps segment receivables by age (e.g., 30/60/90+ days).
  • Supports credit policy by:
    • Identifying slow-paying customers
    • Prioritizing collection efforts
    • Influencing decisions on credit limits and terms

Q3. Scenario: Shift from SLM to WDV

  • SLM provides equal expense yearly; WDV matches depreciation to asset usage.
  • Industry vs. Business-specific: Industry alignment improves comparability; business usage aligns costs with revenue.
  • Implications: Change in method affects profit trends, compliance (AS 10), and disclosure requirements.

Q4. Depreciation Method Analysis

  • SLM: Consistent expense, preferred in stable asset-use industries (e.g., infrastructure).
  • WDV: Higher initial depreciation, suitable for tech/vehicles.
  • Impact: Profit (higher in early years under WDV), Asset value (lower under WDV in early years).

Q5. Historical Cost Limitation

  • Fails to capture asset appreciation during inflation.
  • Alternatives:
    • Fair value accounting (AS 10/Ind AS 16)
    • Revaluation model
  • Pros/Cons: More realistic but introduces volatility and subjectivity.

Q6. Asset Impairment Reporting for Obsolete Tech

  • Conduct impairment test (Ind AS 36): Compare carrying value with recoverable amount.
  • Impact:
    • Balance Sheet: Reduction in asset value.
    • P&L: Recognition of impairment loss.

Q7. Cash vs. Accrual Accounting

  • Cash accounting: Records on payment/receipt basis.
  • Accrual accounting: Records based on economic events.
  • Accrual is better for fixed assets as it reflects depreciation and liabilities; cash gives an incomplete picture.

Q8. Scenario: Manual inventory control issues

  • Issues: Stock mismatches, delays, inaccurate financials.
  • AIS Role:
    • Automates inventory tracking (perpetual system)
    • Enhances accuracy & real-time updates
  • Entries impacted: Inventory (Dr/Cr), COGS, Purchase returns, Spoilage write-offs.


🧾 Unit 4: Accounting for Assets (Cash, Inventory, Receivables, Fixed Assets)

1. Rising receivables & declining cash flow

  • Implications: Strains liquidity, higher credit risk, potential inflation of profit without cash backing.
  • Key indicators:
    • Debtor turnover ratio
    • Average collection period
    • Aging report (e.g., % beyond 90 days)
    • Bad debt ratio

2. Ageing report utility

  • Segmentation: Categorizes receivables by aging buckets.
  • Supports decisions: Sets credit limits, prioritizes collections, enables dynamic credit policy in B2B.

3. SLM vs WDV depreciation method choice

  • Industry alignment aids comparability; usage-based selection reflects actual wear.
  • Changing method impacts:
    • Profit (higher early and lower later under WDV)
    • Net asset values
    • Disclosure requirements as per Ind AS/AS 10

4. Depreciation method effects

  • SLM: Steady expense, preserves asset value early—preferred in low-depletion industries.
  • WDV: Front-loaded expense—common in tech/manufacturing.
  • Impacts reported profit and book value.

5. Historical cost vs fair value

  • Limitations: Doesn’t reflect inflation; undervalues assets.
  • Alternatives:
    • Fair value/revaluation (more current but volatile).
    • Cost-historical plus periodic revaluation (introduces subjectivity).

6. Asset impairment process

  • Under Ind AS 36: Compare carrying amount with recoverable amount (higher of value-in-use or net selling price), and impair if needed.
  • BS: Write down asset; P&L: Impairment loss is expensed.

7. Cash vs accrual for fixed assets

  • Cash method: Records purchases only when paid.
  • Accrual method: Includes depreciation and related liabilities—provides richer financial insight and matching of expense to usage.

8. Automated inventory systems

  • Shifts to perpetual tracking—reduces mismatches, manual errors.
  • Entries impacted:
    • Inventory WIP, purchases, COGS, returns, write-offs.

💳 Unit 5: Accounting for Liabilities and Equity

1. Non-convertible debentures impact

  • Entries:
    • Dr Cash, Cr Debentures Payable
  • Impact:
    • Higher liabilities
    • Lower equity ratio
    • Key ratios: Debt-to-equity ↑, interest coverage ↓

2. Debenture issue cost error

  • Impact: Profit understated, equity reduced
  • Correction: Capitalize issue cost under Ind AS 32/108 and amortize over life of debenture

3. Capital structure comparison

  • Debt-heavy: Tax shield via interest; higher financial risk
  • Equity-heavy: No mandatory payouts; ownership dilution
  • Stronger: Depends on ROE, cost of capital, risk appetite

4. Retained earnings without dividends

  • Pros: Funds future growth
  • Cons: May disappoint shareholders
  • Balance: Firms in growth phase should retain; mature firms should deliver returns

5. Role of retained earnings

  • Reinvestment fuels growth; dividends support investor trust.
  • Strategic distribution builds goodwill and capital flexibility

6. Liquidity mismatch scenario

  • Balance Sheet: Current liabilities > current assets
  • Ratios: Current ratio low (<1), quick ratio, working capital negative
  • Risk: Signals potential default risk, liquidity crunch

7. Preference shares vs equity

  • Preference: Fixed dividend, no voting, priority claim
  • Equity: Dividend dependent on P&L, voting rights
  • Implications: Affects dividend obligations and EPS

📊 Unit 6: Financial Statement Analysis & Interpretation

1. Identical profit, different debt‑equity ratios

  • Ratios reveal financial stability differences.
  • High debt increases risk; lower equity ratio signals vulnerability

2. Profitability ratios in isolation

  • Ignore efficiency (asset turnover), leverage, liquidity
  • Integrate ratios for balanced view

3. Same profit; current ratio varies

  • Low current ratio (Beta) flags liquidity concerns despite same profit
  • Risk of inability to finance operations immediately

4. Strong EBIT, low interest coverage

  • Business generates profit but can’t service interest
  • Need to adjust risk assessment; cautious stance

5. Share-based ratios (EPS, P/E, dividend yield)

  • Useful but influenced by accounting policies, one-off items, market sentiment
  • Should be used with broader context

6. Strong current ratio but negative operating cash flow

  • Inconsistency due to receivables, inventory, prepayments
  • Liquidity ratios can mislead if not backed by cash flow

7. Integrated analysis model

  • Common-size: Standardizes item sizes
  • Trend: Shows changes over time
  • Ratio: Highlights specific relationships
  • Combined: detects operability, liquidity, solvency, growth

💵 Unit 7: Statement of Cash Flows

1. Rising profits, negative operating cash flow

  • Caused by accrual accounting (receivables ↑, payables ↓), indicates low cash integrity

2. Indirect vs direct method

  • Indirect: Adjusts profit for cash effects; understands net adjustments
  • Direct: Lists actual receipts/payments—clearer where customers and suppliers impact lies

3. Profit ≠ cash flow (e.g., GreenTech)

  • Examine changes in working capital—like receivables, inventory
  • Identify depreciation, provisions, and deferred taxes

4. Omitting cash flow from pitch deck

  • Misleading—investors look closely at cash
  • Operating, investing, financing sections provide full picture of sustainability

5. Financing cash flow

  • Shows debt issuance/repayment, equity issues, dividends
  • Red flags: Persistent borrowing, excessive dividends vs. cash

6. Capex vs income statement timing

  • Capex reduces cash immediately but doesn’t show as expense on P&L (only over time via depreciation)

7. Triangulating the three statements

  • Cash flow reconciles profit with actual cash change
  • Balance sheet shows financial position
  • Profit & Loss shows performance—together provide comprehensive view

8. Transition to direct method

  • Systems: Modify ERP for daily cash classification
  • Staff: Train in cash flow content and significance
  • Investor communication: Explain transparency benefits, transitional impact

9. Frequent short-term borrowings

  • Sign of structural liquidity deficiency
  • Credit agencies: view unfavorably, may downgrade
  • Stakeholder trust declines due to higher perceived risk

📚 Units 8 & 9: Financial Reporting Standards I & II

1. GAAP to Ind AS transition

  • Challenges:
    • Reconciling previous financials (opening balance sheet)
    • Fair value adjustments
    • New recognition methods
  • Changes may distort comparability across periods

2. Role of ASB

  • ASB promotes transparency, global alignment
  • Its role has improved Indian standards, though some divergence persists (e.g., IFRS vs Ind AS pathways)

3. Depreciation method flexibility

  • Pros: Aligns with matching principle
  • Cons: Comparability issues
  • Uniformity vs discretion is a delicate trade-off

4. Principles-based (IFRS) vs rules-based (US GAAP / AS)

  • IFRS: Flexibility, global applicability, but need judgment
  • US/AS: Specific guidance reduces divergence, may limit emergence of new models
  • Multinationals prefer IFRS for global standardization

5. Roadmap: AS → Ind AS

  • Phased goals:
    • 0–6 months: training & assessments
    • 6–12 months: system upgrades & pilot runs
    • 12–18 months: parallel financials & disclosures
    • Ongoing: full reporting under Ind AS

6. UK & UAE subsidiaries

  • Local standards differ in fair value, consolidation rules, financial instruments
  • Harmonization tools:
    • Bridge/reconciliation statements
    • Uniform accounting policies
    • Uniform consolidation methods and forex policies

Unit 10: Corporate Financial Statements

1. Scenario: Exceptional Items

Q: A listed company reports exceptional items in the Profit and Loss Statement.
A: Exceptional items may distort the assessment of recurring profitability. Proper classification helps stakeholders distinguish ongoing performance from one-time events, thus ensuring more reliable financial analysis.


2. Misclassification of Operating Income

Q: What are the implications of misclassifying operating income as other income?
A: It skews EBITDA, PBT, and Net Profit Margin, giving a false picture of core operating efficiency. Misclassification undermines comparability and investor trust.


3. Scenario: Profit vs Loan (XYZ Ltd.)

Q: Profit of ₹5 crore vs ₹15 crore loan on Balance Sheet.
A: Profit is reported in P&L; loan is a financing activity in the Balance Sheet. Reading both together is crucial for full understanding of financial health—profitability alone doesn't indicate solvency.


4. Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)

Q: How does OCI relate to shareholder equity?
A: OCI affects equity without impacting net income. It includes items like actuarial gains/losses or revaluation reserves. Changes in OCI reveal long-term financial risks or gains.


5. Case: No Dividend Despite Profits

Q: Why might a profitable company not pay dividends?
A: Possible reasons include reinvestment needs, debt repayment, or building reserves. Shareholders must evaluate long-term strategy, not just short-term returns.


6. Scenario: Vehicle Recorded as Expense

Q: Vehicle classified under ‘office expenses’ instead of an asset.
A: This inflates expenses, reduces net profit, and undervalues assets. It misleads users and violates accounting principles (e.g., Matching & Consistency).


7. Scenario: Sharp Drop in PAT but Stable EBITDA

Q: What explains this divergence?
A: Factors like higher depreciation, interest, or tax can reduce PAT while EBITDA remains stable. Analysts should focus on underlying components to assess performance quality.


8. Segment Reporting

Q: Why is segment reporting useful?
A: It allows investors to evaluate risk and performance across different business units. Aids capital allocation decisions and helps in identifying growth areas or problem segments.


9. Case: No ‘Other Income’ Disclosure

Q: Why is it critical to disclose ‘other income’?
A: Transparency about non-core income like rent/interest aids accuracy in profitability assessment. Helps users distinguish operating vs. non-operating performance.


10. Scenario: Reserves and Surplus

Q: Why are profits retained in reserves?
A: Companies retain earnings for expansion, risk management, or debt servicing. Reserves enhance financial stability and signal prudent management.


Unit 11: Ethics in Accounting

1. Scenario: Adjusting Revenue for Targets

Q: Is this ethical?
A: No. It violates integrity, objectivity, and fairness. Stakeholders, including investors, are misled, potentially affecting valuations and decisions.


2. Scenario: Delaying Expenses

Q: Is this proper accounting?
A: No. It breaches the accrual principle and ethical norms. Deliberately manipulating period-end entries for appearance is deceptive and unethical.


3. Case: Ignoring Small Errors

Q: Why disclose small mistakes?
A: Ethical accounting demands full transparency. Even small errors can accumulate, affect audit trails, and compromise reliability.


4. Forensic Accounting

Q: How is forensic auditing different from internal audit?
A: It focuses on detecting fraud, uses legal evidence, and is often used in litigation. Internal audits assess control effectiveness and operational risks.


5. Creative Accounting

Q: When does smoothing earnings become unethical?
A: If used to mislead stakeholders or violate accounting principles, it crosses into manipulation. Intent and impact determine ethics.


6. Scenario: Pending Legal Case Note

Q: Is the note sufficient?
A: No. Readers need estimates of potential liability or disclosure of uncertainty to assess risk exposure properly.


7. Case: Auditor Overlooks Minor Error

Q: What's at risk here?
A: Independence and professional skepticism. Long-term consequences include loss of audit credibility, regulatory penalties, and firm reputation damage.


8. Ethics Education

Q: Should ethics be standalone or integrated?
A: Integration ensures ethics becomes a natural part of professional judgment. However, a standalone module builds strong foundational values.


9. Case: Whistleblower Fear

Q: How can firms encourage whistleblowing?
A: Establish anonymous reporting, whistleblower protection policies, and an ethical culture through leadership support and training.


10. Scenario: No Explanation in Annual Report

Q: Why is contextual reporting important?
A: Numbers alone can be misleading. Explanations add clarity, enhance investor trust, and meet transparency expectations.


Unit 12: Emerging Trends in Accounting

1. Scenario: Cloud-Based Accounting

Q: What are the effects of shifting to the cloud?
A: Benefits: Real-time data, accessibility, cost efficiency.
Risks: Data security, compliance, cyber threats. Requires robust controls.


2. Blockchain & Auditing

Q: Can blockchain enhance audits?
A: Yes—immutable records and transparency reduce fraud. However, it complements but doesn’t yet fully replace traditional audits.


3. Digital Transformation Roadmap

Q: What should a roadmap include?
A:

  • Phase 1: Assess & Plan
  • Phase 2: Infrastructure Upgrade
  • Phase 3: Training & Culture Change
  • Phase 4: AI & Compliance Integration
  • Phase 5: Review & Optimize

4. Big Data & Accountants’ Role

Q: How does big data change accounting?
A: Accountants become strategic advisors, requiring skills in data interpretation, visualization, and forecasting—not just bookkeeping.


5. AI vs. Human Judgment

Q: Can AI fully replace accountants?
A: No. AI reduces errors in routine tasks but judgment in complex cases (e.g., valuation, risk assessment) still requires human intervention.


6. Ethical Risks of Automation

Q: What safeguards are needed?
A: Strong internal controls, transparency logs, human oversight, and regular audits of AI outputs to avoid bias or fraud.


7. Scenario: Fintech Startup with Bots

Q: What risks arise in such automation?
A: Regulatory non-compliance, errors without human checks, data leaks. Needs risk management, role-based access control, and regular validation.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Session 1 - Chapter 1 & 2 - Introduction to Microeconomics, Demand and Supply Analysis.pdf"

Let's go through each unit's caselets and Higher Order Thinking Questions (HOTS)

casestudy